The Future of Online Analytical Processing
In the fast-changing world of data analytics, businesses must manage and analyze vast amounts of data efficiently. Traditionally, tools like SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS), IBM Cognos, and other data cube-based solutions have been central to Business Intelligence (BI). However, as data grows and analysis becomes more complex, these technologies can no longer meet modern demands. Therefore, this article explains why cube-based solutions are obsolete and presents better alternatives.
The Rise and Fall of Data Cubes
Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) data cube solutions once set the standard for complex analytics on multidimensional data. They allowed users to build pre-aggregated cubes from transactional data, speeding up reporting and querying times.
However, with the advent of bigger, more complex data ecosystems, these solutions have started to show their age. The challenges they present are multifaceted:
- Limited Scalability: Data cubes work well with structured, relational data in a fixed schema. However, businesses now handle larger datasets, including unstructured data like social media, logs, and sensor data. As a result, OLAP cubes struggle to scale for big data, making them less suitable for modern environments.
- Rigid Schema: A data cube relies on specific dimensions and measures, often locked into a pre-defined schema. In today’s fast-paced data world, however, businesses need greater flexibility. They must be able to quickly pivot, adjust, and query new data sources without the constraints of a rigid schema in order to stay competitive.
- Performance Bottlenecks: OLAP cubes once excelled in query-heavy environments, but rising data volume now causes performance issues. Moreover, pre-aggregated environments can become stale, and querying large cubes often leads to slowdowns. Additionally, managing these cubes becomes cumbersome as businesses continuously load and aggregate new data.
- High Maintenance Costs: Building and maintaining data cubes is a resource-intensive process. Data must be periodically refreshed, and this can lead to high operational costs in terms of storage, computing, and administrative overhead.
What Are the Alternatives?
- Columnar databases store data in columns, thereby optimizing analytical queries and outperforming traditional relational databases in OLAP operations. For instance, examples include Amazon Redshift, SAP HANA, Google BigQuery, Azure Synapse, and Apache Cassandra, all available as cloud-based or open-sources solutions.
 |  |  |  |  |
- Distributed computing frameworks, such as Apache Spark, process large datasets in a distributed manner, enabling faster and more scalable analytics.
- Data lakehouses, like those built with Databricks or Snowflake, offer a unified approach to data storage and analytics, combining the flexibility of data lakes with the structure and governance of data warehouses.
 |  |
The Cases for Columnar Databases, Lakehouses, and Distributed Frameworks
As organizations seek more efficient data processing and analysis, they increasingly adopt columnar databases, data lakehouses, and distributed frameworks. These technologies provide significant advantages over traditional OLAP cubes, enabling faster, more flexible, and scalable handling of large, complex datasets.
Columnar Databases
- Columnar databases, such as Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake, store data by columns rather than by rows. This storage format offers several key benefits over traditional row-based systems and OLAP cubes:
- Optimized for Analytical Queries: Columnar databases excel in query-heavy environments. Storing data in columns enables faster retrieval and better compression, especially for large datasets. Querying a subset of columns is much faster than with row-based systems.
- Scalability: Columnar databases handle massive data volumes. Cloud-based solutions like Snowflake and BigQuery scale horizontally, allowing companies to add more compute power as their data grows, without the limitations of traditional data storage solutions.
- Flexibility: Unlike data cubes, which require a fixed schema and predefined aggregation logic, columnar databases handle dynamic schemas, enabling businesses to adjust their data models on the fly. This flexibility is crucial for today’s fast-moving data environments.
Data Lakehouses
- Data lakehouses represent an evolution f both data lakes and traditional data warehouses. They combine the scalability and flexibility of a data lake with the structure and performance optimizations of a data warehouse. Data lakehouses like Databricks, Delta Lake, and Apache Hudi are gaining traction because they address the challenges faced by both traditional warehouses and lakes.
- Unifying Data Storage: Lakehouses allow businesses to store structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data in a single repository. This eliminates the need to manage multiple data silos, such as separate data lakes and data warehouses, and streamlines the data pipeline.
- Real-Time Analytics: Lakehouses support real-time data integration and analytics, allowing companies to gain insights as data arrives without waiting for batch processing. This real-time capability offers a significant advantage over the outdated, pre-aggregated model of data cubes, which often struggle with up-to-date data.
- Cost Efficiency: Lakehouses take advantage of the low-cost, highly scalable storage infrastructure of data lakes while delivering optimized performance and management features similar to a traditional data warehouse. This provides a much more cost-effective solution for modern enterprises handling large volumes of data.
- Data Governance and Integrity: Data lakes have traditionally lacked structure, but lakehouses address this challenge by offering strong data governance and transactional consistency, making them much more reliable for analytical workloads.
Distributed Processing Frameworks
- Distributed processing frameworks like Apache Spark, Apache Flink, and Dask process large datasets across many nodes in a cluster. These systems enable fast, parallelized computation and are especially useful for real-time or near-real-time data processing at scale.
- Scalability and Speed: Distributed frameworks efficiently handle massive amounts of data by dividing tasks across multiple processors. They allow businesses to scale up or down as needed based on the workload, significantly speeding up data processing times, especially for big data workloads.
- Flexibility in Data Processing: Unlike traditional OLAP systems, distributed frameworks handle various data types and sources. Whether structured, semi-structured, or unstructured, these frameworks process data seamlessly, making them more adaptable to modern data environments.
- Advanced Analytics: Distributed processing frameworks support complex machine learning, AI, and real-time analytics, capabilities that traditional OLAP cubes can’t match. As businesses seek to leverage advanced analytics, these frameworks play a crucial role in processing and analyzing data in real time.
How to Migrate Toward Newer Options
The transition from using legacy cube-based technologies may seem daunting, but it is well worth the effort in the long run. here are a few steps companies can take to make the shift:
- Assess Current Infrastructure: Companies should start by evaluating their existing data architecture. Do they rely heavily on data cubes for analytical workloads? Are they facing specific performance or scalability challenges? Understanding these pain points will guide the design of a more efficient, future-proof solution.
- Choose the Right Solution: Based on your evaluation, select a combination of technologies that best fit your business needs. You might choose a columnar database for quick analytics, a lakehouse for flexible data storage, and a distributed framework for processing large-scale data workloads.
- Migrate Data: Transitioning from legacy systems to modern architectures requires careful planning, especially for data migration. Ensure your data is clean, well-organized, and ready for the new system. In some cases, you may need to transform your data models to align with the new architecture.
- Optimize for Analytics: After migration, optimize the performance of your new system. This may involve fine-tuning query performance, partitioning data, or leveraging distributed computing power for more efficient processing.
- Train Teams: Switching to a new data system requires new skills and workflows. Make sure that BI teams, data engineers, and analysts are trained on the new technology and tools, ensuring a smooth transition and minimizing downtime.
We Can Help
The team at MetaFactor are well-versed with the world of data warehousing, business intelligence, lakehouse architectures, columnar databases, and distributed processing frameworks. We can help guide you and lead the way to a more future-proof and scalable data analytics architecture. Please contact us today to learn more.